Basic Truths: Witnessing #5
- We're in a Sunday School series on "Basic Bible Truths"
- we've been studying those Basic Bible truths that every
believer needs to know and be applying
- most recently we've studied the tongue, and what the Bible
says about that important subject
- first we talked about all the wrong things (the Bible
identfies) we could do with our tongues and how those
things needed to be put off
- next we studied all the right things that could be done
- that has brought us to our current topic - the topic of
witnessing
- in other words - we're studying what God's Word says
about using our tongues to tell others about Jesus
Christ.
- now I realize we have different classes here this morning
who are at different stages in the material
- we also have folks who are visiting (and you're surely
a special joy to us)
- but to draw us all together and get us thinking
the same way--let me ask you this:
- INPUT - why is it important for us to study this
subject?
- whether you're a high schooler
- you're newly married
- you're middle aged
- whatever comes after middle age...
- One of the keys to becoming more effective in this area is
developing the ability to handle objections.
- now the Faith Bible class has already spent a week on that
by discussing three or four of the more common objections
and how they can be answered from God's Word.
- here's what I'd like to do today
- I'd like to begin by studying How to Develop A "Philosophy
of Objections" (I'll tell you what I mean by that in a
minute)
- If we have any time remaining , we'll look at some
additional objections
- now, the following week, Lord willing, our classes will
be back in their regular settings and we'll catch
everbody up so all that we will have all studied the
same objections, just in a different order
- let's begin this morning by talking about: Developing A
Philosophy of Objections
- now when I say "philosophy", I'm not talking about
deeep philosophical questions.
- we're not going to talk about earth, fire, and
water and the philosophical question of the one and
the many
- but I believe we need to think through - "What is your
response (when you're talking to someone about the
Lord) when they have an objection?
- not asking "what is your specific verbal response to
their specific objection."
- instead, I'm asking--"how do you respond mentally
(faciallly, in your tone of voice, emotionally) to
the fact that that person has an objection?
- I want to propose to you this morning that that's a
critical question.
- Is it automatically bad that someone has an objection?
- Is it automatically good?
- Should you view that as a personal attack?
- Are there different kinds of objections?
- See, How do you respond mentally just to the fact that the
person you're talking to about the Lord has a question or
an objection?
- I think we need to say this as well
- the answer to that question reveals a lot.
- what we're going to try to show today is:
- it may reveal some ways that we need to change.
- We may have some thinking (and resulting
behavior) on this subject that doesn't really
square with God's Word and therefore it needs
to change.
- in order to Develop a Philosophy of objections, one of the
first questions we need to ask is:
I. Do people have the "right" to have objections and the
ability to think them through?
- Now let's chew on that for a minute.
- we're saying--when you're talking to a friend or
loved one about the message of salvation from the
Bible,
- you're telling them about God and His holiness.
- and about sin and it's affect on man
- you're talking about our Savior and the need to
trust Him as Savior and Lord
- and in the middle of that presentation, or at
the end that person raises an objection
- my question is: Do they have a right to do
that?... and assuming they do, and assuming
you answer that objection... do they really
have the ability as unregenerate people
with unregenerate minds to think through
the answers anyway?
- that's really the point when it comes to having a biblical
philosophy of objections:
- What part does the unregenerate human mind have in the
process anyway?
- now, I'd like to present this.
- the way you answer that question is going to have great
impact on the way you witness (or don't witness).
- what I'd like to do here is this:
- let's sketch out two possible answers, and then go to
the Scriptures and find out which answer is right.
A. two possible answers
1. unsaved man is still completely rational.
- people who believe this would say things like this:
a. Mind wasn't affected by the fall.
cf. Aristotle - "human mind is capable of
bridging the gap between the natural
and the supernatural."
cf. Aquainas - "the fall of man did not
affect the mind."
- I probably need to say here--we're not talking about things
that can be objectively proven.
- we're not talking about mathmatics.
- under common grace--an unbeliever can do just as good a
job learning 2 + 2 as a believer.
- when we talk about being rational, people who hold this
position would say that:
b. unsaved man has the ability to rationally consider
and prove things like:
- the existence of God
- the validity of the Bible
- need for salvation
- all of this apart from the Scripture
- now I realize you might say-PV, what does all of this have
to do with witnessing?
- Answer is - this has everything to do with witnessing.
- let's think about:
-- the impact of this position of witnessing
(c. implications)
1) reason is elevated
- people who hold this position are saying saying
this:
- the reason more people are not saved is
because we haven't done a good enough job
explaining/defending God and His Word.
- See, man is rational--and if we can just find
somebody who was swallowed by a whale and
lived-then they'll believe the book of Jonah.
- Then if we can disprove the theory of evolution
or the Carbon 14 dating method
- if we'll just do a better job of explaining/defending/
arguing--then man with his rational capabilities will of
course see the truth and trust Christ as Savior.
(another result)
2) Faith unnecessary (or not nearly as important as reason)
- see, if you hold that unsaved man is completely
rational--and if you just give him the facts, he'll
automatically see the truth of those facts and believe
- then what's the need of faith?
- the answer is - there isn't much need for faith.
(we'll say more about that later)
3) The witnesses ability to handle objections becomes
supremely important.
- not just objections about what the Bible says,
but objections in the area of philosophy, science,
every other discipline.
- see, if man's mind is rational, and if:
- the primary reason more people are not saved is
because we haven't done a good enough job proving or
defending God and his message
- then we have to become expert "objection"
handlers.
- INPUT - what impact do you think that would have on
witnessing? (few would do it -- never quite
qualified)
4) Always looking for more external proofs/arguments.
- folks who hold this position say:
- we've got to find the ark.
- see, if we find it, men/women are rational
enough to see the obvious conclusions and will
believe the Bible and the message of salvation.
- or we've got to prove that the Shroud of Turin is
real.
- see, always looking for more external proofs/arguments
apart from the Bible itself.
- now, what's another possible answer?
2. unsaved man is completely irrational
a. no right to any objections, even to clarify what
the Bible says.
b. No ability to think through answers to questions
anyway, even Bible answers to Bible questions.
c. Ought to "simply believe" and forget about
questions.
- Implications of this position to witnessing are:
(d. implications)
1) Share "the plan" and that's it.
- So, if you like using the Roman's road
- you share that plan, and that end say
- now, either accept this and go to heaven or
reject it and go to hell.
- the person says, but what about...
- (you cut them off) No, no questions---accept it or
reject it-what's it going to be?
- you're completely irrational
- your mind has been ruined by the fall and you
have no ability to think whatsoever
- therefore, no objections!
- but...
- No objections...one more objection and I'm
leaving!
2) no reason to study objections
- now, let me ask you to think about a couple of questions:
- (not asking you to answer them out loud at this point)
- which one of these positions is right?
- Is man's mind rational, or is it completely
irrational?
- Which of these positions do you hold?
- (probably the most important)--when we look at your
witnessing habits, which position would your
practice/lifestyle say you're most like?
II. What does the Scripture teach? (about the condition of
unsaved man's mind and its place in the salvation
process.)
A. Every human mind has been indelibly marred by sin.
1. Gen. 3/Rom. 5:12
- we're not going to take time to look up every
one of these passages, but you know that Gen. 3
tells of the fall of mankind, and Rom. 5:12
says that the fall affected every human who was
ever born.
- the sin nature is transmitted by the regular
process of procreation--thats why (by the way),
our Savior had to be born of a virgin.
- point from this passage - every person has been affected
by sin.
- these other verses show how sin affects our minds--our
ability to think and reason.
2. Gen. 6:5 (READ)
- here's a passage that records the terrible
affects of sin on mankind.
- "every imagination of the thoughts of his heart
were only evil continually"
- you know, that two verses later the Lord says
that man must be destroyed by a flood.
3. Jer. 17:9 (READ)
- the same idea is found here. The heart
(control center--including our minds/ability to
think and reason) is deceitful and desperately
wicked.
- same idea is confirmed in the NT.
4. Eph. 4:17-19 (READ)
- what are we saying by all this? We're saying that
according to God's Word, every person's mind has been
indelibly marred by sin.
- There's something very wrong with the mind of every human.
B. Unsaved man suppresses or twists whatever truth he
has or hears.
Rom. 1:18-23
- this is an important addition.
- The Scripture does say, that while man's mind
is marred, he is given a "knowledge of God."
- in other words, God has been gracious is
allowing men/women still to be born after the
fall with some knowledge that God exists.
- but look what man does with it.
- instead of building on that knowledge.
- instead of allowing that knowledge to drive
him to the Scripture.
- instead of hungering and thirsting after
righteousness.
- he suppresses the truth. - he ignores it.
- see, unsaved man's mind is incapable of
learning truth about God and eternity
apart from the Bible.
- and whatever truth he was given, he
suppresses.
- that means this:
C. no amount of rational proofs will overcome this
stubborn mental resistance.
1. Luke 16:19-31
- we're not going to take time to go through this
passage verse by verse
- but let's just think it through together:
- this is the passage about the rich man and Lazarus.
- Lazarus (not the Lazarus that Jesus raised from
the dead) was a beggar -- who had trusted
Christ as Savior
- in this parable, there was also a rich man who
was had not been saved.
- the parable says that the Rich man had two
requests from Abraham (remember, this is a
parable: (in this parable-the man in hell could
speak to Abraham)
INPUT - what were they?
1) that Lazarus get him a drink.
2) that Lazarus would be sent to talk to the
man's 5 brothers and tell them about Christ
so they wouldn't go to hell and suffer the
torment they were suffering.
- his point was - if something supernatural
or extraordinary happened, then his
brothers would believe.
- now two things happened next (one
surprising and one not so surprising)
- the not so surprising thing was -
Abraham refused the request.
- the surprising thing is - the reason
he gave for refusing the request.
- he said (in effect) - that wouldn't change
your brothers anyway.
- READ 29-31
- point is - man's mind has been so affected by sin that no
amount of rational proofs will overcome that stubborn
resistence.
- another example of that is:
2. Rev. 9:20-21, 16:21
- both of these passages are in the context of
the Tribulation judgements.
- but even in the midst of terrible and awesome
displays of the holiness and power of God--the
people in these verses refuse to repent.
- in fact, some even continue to blaspheme.
- now, what does that mean?
- that means that position #1 is wrong.
- unsaved man is not completely rational. We'll talk
about some implications of all this in a minute.
- question now is - If position #1 is wrong, then does that
make position #2 right?
- INPUT? (the answer to that is "No", though we're closer to
position #2 than we are to position #1.
- the reason is:
D. Unsaved man does have the ability to think through
the claims of Scripture.
- see, there's a lifeline for unsaved man. (draw a
picture of a Bible with a line going to it)
- it's admittedly thin, but it does exist.
- unsaved man does have the ability to think through
the claims of Scripture.
- he can't find truth on his own
- he'll always suppress what he finds
- unless he submits himself to the Word
- now, how do we know that?
- Why do we witness to people instead of
witnessing to cats?
(one answer - who wants cats in heaven?)
1. man was made in the image of God
Gen. 1:26-27
2. that image, though marred, still exists after the
fall.
Gen. 9:6, James 3:9
**Therefore, man still has enough mental ability
left to think through the claims of the
Scripture if:
1) exercise faith
2) submit to the Holy Spirit's work in his
heart through the Word.
- now, how does all this apply to the way we witness?
III. Implications
A. Objections are not automatically bad
- now, remember what we said at the outset.
- this study might reveal some thinking on our parts
that needs to change.
- remember one of the questions we asked at the
beginning.
- Do people have the right to have objections?
- INPUT - what's the answer to that? (YES)
- in fact, we ought to expect them to.
- for many, the message of salvation is going
to be completely new.
- (develop - people aren't gospel hardened...)
- illus - I'm a marchian who comes to earth and
you're going to show me the ropes.
- first you teach me about oreo cookies
- then you take me outside and teach me
about dirt.
- maybe I'm trying to be proud-whatever
- but I object - these two things
aren't different--they're the same
- maybe thats a foolish objection--but what would you expect
from a person from outer space?
- the point is - some of us get uptight when someone objects,
we might even stay away from witnessing because someone
might object.
- we need to change that attitude,
- the fact that they are objecting may be a sign that
they are using their sin cursed mind and perhaps
for the first time seriously thinking through the
claims of Christ on their life.
- it would be like a dead corpse coughing.
- that may be a good sign!
B. Intelligence in one area of life doesn't mean there's
intelligence in every area.
- some of us really need to hear what the Bible is
saying about this first point.
- you may work around someone who's really a genius
when it comes to their job.
- or they're really well read
- if we're not careful, we might conclude
- I can't talk to this person about Christ,
they'll argue circles around me.
- they're intelligent about everything.
- thats simply not true.
- the person might be a great arguer, but the Bible
says -- if he's unsaved he's intellectually
bankrupt and therefore a great candidate for the
simply truth of God's Word.
- point is - just becaise a person's smart in one area - that
doesn't mean he's smart in all areas.
- cf. License branch
C. Don't be intimidated by questions outside of the Word
of God.
- we don't need to know everything about science and
philosophy
- in fact we've studied plenty of Scripture
that shows that a person's not going to be
saved through those means even if we did know
all the answers.
- when someone has an objection about a subject the
Bible doesn't address -- lovingly and simply put
that one aside.
D. Direct objections back to the Word
Rom. 1:16-17
Heb. 4:12-13
E. Emphasize the importance of faith
IV. Question we need to ask